Laporkan Penyalahgunaan

Designer Edward Crutchley Draws Mode Inspiration From The Korean 'Gat'

Posting Komentar

Article: English designer falls inwards dearest alongside the Korean 'gat' in addition to features it inwards his fashion exhibit "powerful charm"

Source: Joongang Ilbo via Naver

1. [+311, -11] Why is our authorities non maxim anything near PRC claiming our hanbok equally theirs? 

2. [+70, -2] And withal PRC is currently claiming the hanbok equally theirs ㅠㅠㅠ

3. [+58, -0] This designer must've watched 'Kingdom' on Netflix ㅋㅋㅋ

4. [+38, -0] Who are the people downvoting this article? The Chinese? Yes, Korea has received a lot of cultural influence from PRC but the hanbok was originally our export that the Yuan dynasty received when Koryeo was trendy. We are the master copy creators of the hanbok;; 

5. [+29, -0] PRC lacks their ain originality in addition to thence they simply pocket everyone else's ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

6. [+7, -0] Looks similar a westernized grim reaper

7. [+7, -0] The 'gat' genuinely is an impressive design. A lot of the virile soul accessories from the Chosun are perfectly matched alongside all the clothing

8. [+1, -0] Seeing the 'gat' styled similar this on models makes me intend that it tin genuinely move a unique accessory inwards modern times equally well... I promise that it becomes to a greater extent than pop inwards the future

-

Hanbok seen inwards Chinese drama 'I've Fallen For You'

Article: [Fact Check] Our hanbok originated from China's Ming dynasty?

Source: Yonhap News via Nate

1. [+220, -3] They're claiming anything inwards the basis equally theirs, idiots. This is why they're called cancer.

2. [+185, -10] Are they in addition to thence jealous of our hanboks? The qipao does non await equally elegant ㅋ but this isn't something they tin simply claim in addition to take. Bark all you lot want, no i volition head to you.

3. [+175, -3] They must genuinely similar the hanbok to desire to claim it in addition to thence bad. Please simply know that nosotros don't similar anything you lot guys construct in addition to thence nosotros wouldn't have got copied it inwards the start place.

4. [+15, -1] This simply shows how niggling construct ability PRC has in addition to how niggling confidence they have got inwards their ain civilization that they're trying to pocket roughly other country's civilization ㅋㅋㅋㅋ

5. [+7, -0] To all the Chinese celebrities promoting inwards our province what's your thought on this... in addition to why are you lot fifty-fifty working inwards our country??!

-

A Chinese game offered 'hanbok' wearing apparel items which caused Chinese users to claim them equally Chinese, leading the game to eventually teach rid of the items altogether.

Article: "Hanbok is a traditional Chinese dress?" Game incites Korean-Chinese state of war over the 'hanbok'

Source: Korea Ilbo via Naver

1. [+546, -8] It's fourth dimension to boycott Chinese products. If nosotros don't practise this, we're going to teach the hanbok stolen from us. 

2. [+350, -3] Please ban Chinese games inwards our country. Korean games are banned inwards PRC in addition to thence why are nosotros allowing Chinese gaming companies to construct coin inwards our country?? If PRC bans KakaoTalk in addition to Line, nosotros should move banning WeChat.

3. [+172, -0] Soon they're going to move claiming Zeus equally Chinese...

4. [+125, -3] Just similar how kimonos in addition to hanboks are different, the qipao is dissimilar from the hanbok

5. [+37, -0] They desire everything to move theirs... but the exclusively affair they ain is the virus!!!

-

Related Posts

Posting Komentar