Article: Gucci's $2,600 orangish manly individual dress
Source: Kukmin Ilbo via Naver
1. [+1,208, -24] Who could delineate this off? It looks funny fifty-fifty on the model.. I don't intend fifty-fifty Jung Woo Sung could.. it but looks similar a $2,600 wearing apparel y'all have on when y'all lose a dare. I couldn't have on it for $3, allow lonely for costless ㅋ
2. [+311, -26] I intend 95% of the people who saw this are thinking it's crazy... no? ㅎㅎ
3. [+179, -4] This made me express joy out loud ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
4. [+170, -18] Are they going to have on a bra alongside it too?
5. [+53, -0] Force gender activity criminals to have on this too thence that everyone tin rate the axe recognize them ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
6. [+44, -1] Even the model failed to delineate this off
7. [+24, -2] Daebak.. why have on pants alongside it ㅋ but lay stockings on besides ㅋ
8. [+23, -2] I intend it's pretty. Men demand to pace it upward too showtime dressing improve too. You're non going to instruct a girl dressed the agency you've been lately.
9. [+19, -2] So if nosotros intermission gender rules inwards clothing, what's next? Age rules? Start letting people have on bibs too diapers out too? This feels perverted.
10. [+15, -0] Oh come upward on, this looks similar it was stuck inwards someone's dresser for xx years too was live on flora at a flea market
11. [+15, -4] I intend a blossom man child would await pretty this
12. [+13, -6] I intend this is a fun experiment. Does manly individual or woman individual specific habiliment fifty-fifty be nowadays? I e'er idea it looked cool to encounter women pulling off menswear, too felt deplorable that men didn't own got equally much multifariousness when it came to their ain clothes. You may non intend too thence but these designs are all released because there's consumer demand for it. I'm certain it'll dice a tendency soon. If y'all spend upward to convey it, you'll but autumn behind on the times. Just bask the liberty that you're given ㅋㅋ
-
Posting Komentar
Posting Komentar