Article: Sulli responds to Ha:tfelt revealing her ex-boyfriend's text "You're non an attending wh*re"
Source: Newsen via Nate
1. [+715, -17] From an attending wh*re to some other attending wh*re... from a fool to some other fool...
2. [+571, -37] She revealed her ex-boyfriend's texts, if that doesn't brand her inconsiderate in addition to selfish, in addition to thence what does?
3. [+339, -20] She didn't divulge the texts to hold upwards an attending wh*re, she revealed it equally a cast of revenge against the guy. She wanted the populace to loathe on him, like, "look at how he's talking to me, guys"
4. [+26, -3] So many of the WG members don't seem sane
5. [+24, -6] Typical feminist personality... they don't know how to differentiate betwixt having an watch in addition to beingness disrespectful. They telephone outcry upwards themselves "honest" but from a 3rd political party perspective, they're but beingness a b*tch.
6. [+16, -0] You're non a (bigger) attending wh*re (than me)"
7. [+13, -0] What variety of reply could you lot conk from call for an attending wh*re whether you're an attending wh*re ㅋㅋㅋ
8. [+12, -0] Texts betwixt your partner in addition to you lot should hold upwards kept private. You bring no correct to divulge them unless you lot conk consent. Would you lot similar it if he went but about telling everyone nearly your father's scandal?
9. [+9, -2] A exhibit betwixt 2 attending wh*res ㅋ
10. [+8, -1] By Sulli's standards, she wouldn't intend that's attending wh*rish plenty ㅋㅋㅋ
-
Posting Komentar
Posting Komentar